Small Estate Affidavit Real Estate Florida

participation?

Barracks Gamerra "Solidarity Day" April 27, 2010

In his "point" on Pisainforma (print organ of the City) George Piccioni, after having duly informed that a journalist is only truly independent and not centered photo shots from the right or left, we prayed about the matter barracks to take care of "substance". And he essentially is: "The operation 'barracks open' remains an important issue, to defend and expand. The fact that the barracks can get everyone from children to seniors, it is important democratic safeguard. " (http://www.pisainformaflash.it/notizie/dettaglio.html?nId=6553 )

A Party should finally decide what are the goals of the initiative (solidarity, democracy, civic education and scientific party, is there anything else?) Mr. Piccioni finally grasps the point, if not verbally, the fact that in barracks can enter all would then guarantee democracy.

say yes, although we believe would be better if people could enter without notice, and no real control type unannounced inspection. But there will be granted that democracy is a guarantee of the fact that not all should enter the barracks, and that puts you at least get in on a voluntary basis.

Instead, the public school, which should educate the sign of shared values, taking the daughters and sons of conscientious objectors to the use of weapons (which the objection is enshrined in law) and brings them to the barracks. Children are very perceptive, if you push them in a place where you prepare and military missions where you train the army and we talk about peace, solidarity and humanitarian missions that will be easy to think that the task is to assist Army Social internationally. When parents try to explain to them his deep conviction that weapons are born very difficult to develop positive children have every right to react: Look Ma, look Dad, you're wrong. The armies, with their tanks and supersonic fighter planes from 35 million, are made to save the children: they taught me in school.

That's it. The basis of our protest is not a hatred of the military does not exist or will of a sterile political polemic. And 'consciousness of our right of teachers and educators. We like it to be our shared belief that peace is made with the peace and not with the expenditure and military missions. Apparently not. But we continue to remember that it is not even shared the belief that they can be armed humanitarian missions. And then the school can not bring all the kids in the barracks.

The argument made is that there will be, but you're not obliged , you can always keep children at home. Or, if you do it right along, maybe your children can stay in school while others go on a trip to the barracks to do all the interesting scientific laboratories that have nothing to do absolutely nothing with the army and barracks, but we decided to hold their own in that forum. Apart from the undue costs for parents in the first case (absence from work, baby sitting) the key point is that this would discriminate against children "left school", which would be deprived of educational opportunities to which they have every right.

The solution is one, and we said from the beginning: Day of Solidarity during school hours but out of the barracks, or the Day of Solidarity in the barracks but during non school. In this regard, we can not do without a doubt have some 'bad: If this day is so attractive to the barracks, where many groups and families and young people are so interested in taking part, why so much reluctance to move it to a beautiful Sunday morning? Do not you not afraid that it is not anyone?

Small Estate Affidavit Real Estate Florida

participation?

Barracks Gamerra "Solidarity Day" April 27, 2010

In his "point" on Pisainforma (print organ of the City) George Piccioni, after having duly informed that a journalist is only truly independent and not centered photo shots from the right or left, we prayed about the matter barracks to take care of "substance". And he essentially is: "The operation 'barracks open' remains an important issue, to defend and expand. The fact that the barracks can get everyone from children to seniors, it is important democratic safeguard. " (http://www.pisainformaflash.it/notizie/dettaglio.html?nId=6553 )

A Party should finally decide what are the goals of the initiative (solidarity, democracy, civic education and scientific party, is there anything else?) Mr. Piccioni finally grasps the point, if not verbally, the fact that in barracks can enter all would then guarantee democracy.

say yes, although we believe would be better if people could enter without notice, and no real control type unannounced inspection. But there will be granted that democracy is a guarantee of the fact that not all should enter the barracks, and that puts you at least get in on a voluntary basis.

Instead, the public school, which should educate the sign of shared values, taking the daughters and sons of conscientious objectors to the use of weapons (which the objection is enshrined in law) and brings them to the barracks. Children are very perceptive, if you push them in a place where you prepare and military missions where you train the army and we talk about peace, solidarity and humanitarian missions that will be easy to think that the task is to assist Army Social internationally. When parents try to explain to them his deep conviction that weapons are born very difficult to develop positive children have every right to react: Look Ma, look Dad, you're wrong. The armies, with their tanks and supersonic fighter planes from 35 million, are made to save the children: they taught me in school.

That's it. The basis of our protest is not a hatred of the military does not exist or will of a sterile political polemic. And 'consciousness of our right of teachers and educators. We like it to be our shared belief that peace is made with the peace and not with the expenditure and military missions. Apparently not. But we continue to remember that it is not even shared the belief that they can be armed humanitarian missions. And then the school can not bring all the kids in the barracks.

The argument made is that there will be, but you're not obliged , you can always keep children at home. Or, if you do it right along, maybe your children can stay in school while others go on a trip to the barracks to do all the interesting scientific laboratories that have nothing to do absolutely nothing with the army and barracks, but we decided to hold their own in that forum. Apart from the undue costs for parents in the first case (absence from work, baby sitting) the key point is that this would discriminate against children "left school", which would be deprived of educational opportunities to which they have every right.

The solution is one, and we said from the beginning: Day of Solidarity during school hours but out of the barracks, or the Day of Solidarity in the barracks but during non school. In this regard, we can not do without a doubt have some 'bad: If this day is so attractive to the barracks, where many groups and families and young people are so interested in taking part, why so much reluctance to move it to a beautiful Sunday morning? Do not you not afraid that it is not anyone?

Temperature Transducer Diagram

Letter from a parent

PisaNotizie From: ( http://www.pisanotizie.it/news/lettori_20110222_181298381838.html)

I am a parent of a child attend school in the municipal "Agazzi. Last year, the school, which initially had not acceded to the day of 27 April in the barracks, he was urged to join the ordinary. The membership was made so quickly, and until the last parents not heard anything. When it emerged called for a meeting with the teachers and the commissioner Chiofalo, attended the lady Ciardelli. I remember her as a calm discussion, in which we brought forward our dissent in full respect of opinions different from ours.

Nearby, read a statement on PisaNotizie councilor who said that they heard at a meeting in a kindergarten with the phrase "sure you can do with all the apples and oranges, but the military ...". There seemed possible he was referring to the meeting took place at Agazzi, but we know that human memory is unreliable, influenced by personal interpretation that gives the event, and how they change with time: after one year that phrase has become "All military warmongers" . I would not want that if we continue at this rate, the phrase-in memory becomes increasingly abusive councilor-so if you specify which school believes he heard others who were present at that same meeting, they could tell their memories.

in any case I think that that phrase is very far from the spirit that animated the anti-war parents who have never been opposed to the day itself, but simply asked it to be moved to the place and date, so as not to load symbolic meanings and ideals that, while fully legitimate, are not shared by all, and then are so glaring if the proposed requirement on very young children.

As for the democratic process to which the commissioner alluded to, I point out that the school of info Agazzi still no communication was given in any meeting, neither the Management Committee has addressed the issue: I would not want, such as 'Last year, would come to discuss things already done.

Lucio Bontempelli